![]() If LO scripting were currently implemented in something with the opaqueness andĬomplexity of C then I would be with you 100% but as it is actually implemented Having to make what must be some fairly big changes to the LO codebase would Not be the first choice of many, it is already in place so the advantages of Large user base and is easy to learn for anybody with any prior programmingĮxperience. How powerful the latest variants like VB and Gambas are, but it still has a Basic is much maligned, unfairly in my view given When you have an application like LO with a long history - and hopefully a longįuture ahead - it is probably not practical to introduce or deprecate scripting Years ago and probably won't be in 10 years time. Python is pretty much top of the tree at the moment, but it wasn't 10 The problem with programming languages is that they move in and out of ![]() I imagine you would agree that your suggestion is driven by theĬurrent popularity of Python and the number of programmers who use it at the I can see where you are coming from in championing the use of Python for LO Toward the development of Python into a drop-in companion side-by-side with Perhaps the marketing should be more to the higher-end Python aficionados/as AndĮven LO BASIC and the LO IDE are still a tiny bit rough around the edges. Just how mature LO BASIC is.no offense meant to the Rhino editor for js. ![]() I know that isn't Python, but it really reminded me of Out how to marshal javascript Number types to Uno properties requiring Uno The human resource experience coming from LO BASIC and MS Office VBA is far too I want to champion Python, but emphasize what Nigel V. Know if I should be responding via a website, etc. Long time since I've responded to something in this mailing list. I apologize if this email is not being generated in the right way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |